Pharma daytrippers  

Dr. Leen Kawas on strategies that will upgrade medical studies to obtain high-quality information

Dr. Leen Kawas recognizes the need for accurate medical testing.

However, she understands where much research goes awry using that lens:

There is an apparent lack of communication between all the crucial players in the process.

Further reading: Dr. Leen Kawas on Improving Clinical Trials to Get Quality Data

For instance, the scientific and technical teams must collaborate, as well as scientists and patients.

When proper communication and collaboration occur, the research trial’s primary focus can be on the data quality and patient satisfaction, assuring the study’s success.

The Present Gap in Successful Clinical Study Management

Medical studies, when done correctly, enable health workers to leverage the power of innovative therapeutics for their patients.

The trials disclose how effective the therapies are, the possibility of risks and complications, and other critical information for the treatment process.

The puzzle pieces must click into place for the research to accomplish its main goals: clear, succinct and, ultimately, correct data.

However, most research shows a lack of clarity on the views of leading players at every level of the process.

According to Dr. Kawas, the disparity leads to a lack of patient satisfaction and low-quality data, lowering the relevance of clinical research outcomes.

Getting feedback in real-time is vital in the creation of procedures and targets.

Dr. Leen Kawas informs us that it is critical to gather the patient’s opinion early and often during the creation of the trial procedures.

Unfortunately, in most of these research endeavors, patients and other participants are not consulted until much later in the process.

This is a major oversight because feedback from all participants can aid in formulating appropriate procedures.

Scientists can then use that knowledge to construct more productive research.


Medical studies may only produce valuable information if they are built around specific questions related to the patients’ health requirements.

Only by receiving real-time feedback will you ask all the appropriate questions and guarantee that the research is adequately set up from the beginning.

Input also aids scientists in making precise decisions on how to proceed with the study and make improvements as needed.

Consequently, Dr. Kawas emphasizes the need to start gathering information early and keep the feedback flowing until the conclusion of the research.

Connect to Kawas on

Learn more about Leen Kawas: